Fun with my AI “Watson”

If you have spent any amount of time around Idle Hands Workshop lately, you may have noticed that I have been spending a fair bit of time working with my AI assistant, affectionately named Watson.

Now before anyone gets too serious about it, no, Watson is not replacing actual research, old catalogs, collector knowledge, or hands-on experience. Watson is more like the overly caffeinated research assistant sitting in the corner with a notebook, a magnifying glass, and a suspiciously large pile of rabbit holes.

And honestly, it has been a lot of fun.

Research, Rabbit Holes, and Raccoons with Crowbars

A large part of my current work involves documenting the Defiance by Stanley tool line. That means digging through old catalogs, comparing model numbers, looking at collector photos, chasing undocumented tools, and trying to separate fact from folklore.

Some of that research is serious.

Some of it gets weird.

And some of it becomes the kind of thing that can only happen after too much coffee, too many obscure model numbers, and one too many late-night discussions about Canadian Stanley production.

At some point, while joking about undocumented Defiance tools, Watson and I ended up inventing one of the finest pieces of imaginary tool history ever committed to digital nonsense:

Defiance No. 1744 Moose Adjustment Tool

Naturally, this was related to the also fictional:

Defiance No. 1742 Left-Handed Reverse-Threaded Canadian Crowbar

Because of course it was.

The theory, as it developed, was simple:

The No. 1742 crowbar was used for preliminary field alignment, while the No. 1744 Moose Adjustment Tool was used for final calibration.

The official instructions, according to the completely imaginary 1937 Canadian Defiance catalog, were roughly as follows:

  1. Approach moose cautiously.
  2. Determine degree of misalignment.
  3. Apply No. 1742 Crowbar.
  4. Rotate clockwise while facing magnetic north.
  5. Tighten retaining antlers.
  6. Verify moose is plumb and level using a Defiance level.

This is, of course, complete nonsense.

Probably.

The Serious Side of the Silliness

The funny thing is, jokes like this usually come from real research questions.

The Defiance line really does have undocumented tools, unclear model numbers, reused numbers, Canadian variations, and tools that appear in secondary sources but have not yet been confirmed through catalogs or surviving examples.

That is why the book project and website matter.

The goal is to document what is known, identify what remains uncertain, and preserve as much information as possible before it disappears into old toolboxes, estate sales, forgotten barns, and misidentified auction listings.

Watson helps me organize ideas, draft articles, question assumptions, and sometimes laugh at the absurdity of trying to track down every last tool Stanley ever marked with the Defiance name.

AI as a Workshop Companion

I do not view AI as a replacement for collectors, researchers, or experience.

It is a tool.

Like any tool, it has to be used carefully.

Sometimes it helps organize a massive checklist.

Sometimes it helps draft a chapter.

Sometimes it catches a pattern I might have missed.

And sometimes it invents a Canadian moose adjustment tool.

The important part is knowing the difference.

Final Thoughts

Idle Hands Workshop has always been about curiosity, creativity, tools, history, restoration, and the occasional bad idea that somehow turns into a project.

Working with Watson has simply added one more oddball tool to the bench.

And if anyone out there happens to find a Defiance No. 1744 Moose Adjustment Tool in a barn somewhere, please send photos.

Preferably before attempting adjustment.


AI Image Notice

The image featured in this post was generated using artificial intelligence for entertainment and illustration purposes. It should not be considered historical documentation of any actual Defiance by Stanley tool, Canadian catalog, moose-maintenance procedure, or officially sanctioned use of a crowbar. No moose were adjusted during the creation of this article.

Stephen Written by:

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply